News For You

Another Nurse Reportedly Loses License Following Social Media Video

Posted on

A troubling pattern has emerged in recent months, one that is forcing regulators and employers to confront a question many assumed had long been settled: can medical professionals be trusted to separate personal ideology from their ethical duty to treat patients? A series of high-profile cases involving nurses and other health care workers suggests that, for a small but alarming number of them, the answer has become uncertain.

The incidents span multiple states, but the common thread is the same—political extremism bleeding into a profession built on impartial care. In Florida, a registered nurse sparked national outrage after posting a video expressing a desire for White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt to suffer severe, traumatic injuries during childbirth. The comments were explicit, personal, and impossible to reconcile with any standard of compassionate care. This week, Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo revoked her nursing license, signaling that such rhetoric is not merely offensive but incompatible with the responsibilities of the profession.


Another case unfolded in Virginia, where a nurse anesthetist used TikTok to encourage activists to physically harm ICE agents. The videos allegedly included suggestions to inject agents with drugs that could induce paralysis, poison them through contaminated food, or spray toxic substances into their eyes. The content went far beyond protest speech and into the realm of explicit advocacy of violence. VCU Health terminated her employment after the videos went viral, underscoring how quickly public conduct can end a medical career when it crosses ethical and legal lines.

Florida again made headlines with the case of a nurse who publicly declared he would refuse anesthesia to any patient who supported “MAGA,” claiming it was his right and part of his ethical oath. State officials saw it differently. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced that the nurse was no longer licensed to practice, emphasizing that health care cannot be contingent on political beliefs. His statement was blunt: there is zero tolerance for partisans who place ideology above their duty to treat patients with dignity and respect.


Taken together, these cases reveal more than individual lapses in judgment. They point to a broader cultural problem in which political activism has, for some, overridden professional restraint. Nursing and medicine rely on public trust—the assumption that when someone is vulnerable, the person caring for them will not weigh their politics, identity, or beliefs before providing care. Once that trust erodes, the consequences extend far beyond a single license revocation.

Florida’s decisive actions have been praised by critics of politicized medicine as a necessary line in the sand. Whether other states follow suit remains to be seen, but the message is becoming clearer: advocacy of harm, discrimination, or selective care is not a form of free expression when you hold a medical license. It is a breach of the very foundation of the profession, and increasingly, it is being treated as such.

Related Items:
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top
$(".comment-click-8127").on("click", function(){ $(".com-click-id-8127").show(); $(".disqus-thread-8127").show(); $(".com-but-8127").hide(); }); // The slider being synced must be initialized first $('.post-gallery-bot').flexslider({ animation: "slide", controlNav: false, animationLoop: true, slideshow: false, itemWidth: 80, itemMargin: 10, asNavFor: '.post-gallery-top' }); $('.post-gallery-top').flexslider({ animation: "fade", controlNav: false, animationLoop: true, slideshow: false, prevText: "<", nextText: ">", sync: ".post-gallery-bot" }); });