News For You

Former Mayoral Candidate Responds To Online Claim

Independent journalist Nick Sortor has been reporting from Minneapolis amid ongoing protests related to federal immigration enforcement, and his presence has become part of a separate controversy involving allegations of crime, disputed facts, and political backlash.

According to Sortor, he was robbed of camera equipment valued at approximately $1,000 while documenting events connected to the demonstrations. He claims the incident involved physical force and that he was dragged during the encounter. Sortor further stated that he was able to record the license plate of the vehicle involved and later discovered that it was registered to an organization receiving federal funding, a detail he highlighted as warranting scrutiny rather than dismissal.


Those allegations were quickly challenged by Omar Fateh, a prominent Minneapolis political figure and recent mayoral candidate, who publicly accused Sortor of fabricating the story. Fateh’s response did not focus on calling for an investigation or clarification, but instead framed the account as a deliberate falsehood. That exchange reflects a broader dynamic in which incidents tied to immigration protests are immediately absorbed into partisan narratives, with credibility judgments rendered along political lines rather than through verification.


Sortor subsequently shared a separate account describing an encounter inside a retail store in Minneapolis. He said that after purchasing an item, a store employee asked for proof of purchase. According to Sortor, he displayed a digital receipt on his phone, but the employee was unable to interpret it and attempted to prevent him from leaving the store. Sortor stated that he left the premises without further escalation. He presented the incident as emblematic of broader breakdowns in communication, trust, and basic expectations of conduct in public spaces.


As with the alleged robbery, this account prompted sharp reactions online, with critics questioning Sortor’s interpretation of events and supporters arguing that his experiences highlight real tensions on the ground. What remains consistent across both incidents is the absence of an agreed-upon factual baseline. No public police report or third-party verification has yet resolved the competing claims, leaving the dispute suspended between allegation and denial.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top
$(".comment-click-8039").on("click", function(){ $(".com-click-id-8039").show(); $(".disqus-thread-8039").show(); $(".com-but-8039").hide(); }); // The slider being synced must be initialized first $('.post-gallery-bot').flexslider({ animation: "slide", controlNav: false, animationLoop: true, slideshow: false, itemWidth: 80, itemMargin: 10, asNavFor: '.post-gallery-top' }); $('.post-gallery-top').flexslider({ animation: "fade", controlNav: false, animationLoop: true, slideshow: false, prevText: "<", nextText: ">", sync: ".post-gallery-bot" }); });