News For You

Journalists Issues Report Regarding The Release Of More Information Pertaining To Biden Administration Probe

If there’s one man in Washington who’s earned his stripes — not through grandstanding, but through sheer, tireless investigative grit — it’s Sen. Chuck Grassley. While most of Capitol Hill stays focused on theater and talking points, Grassley continues to dig, unearth, and document what many others are too timid or compromised to confront. And once again, his work has brought to light something explosive — and no, the media isn’t giving it even a fraction of the attention it deserves.

This week, Grassley confirmed what had only been whispered in corners of D.C.: the FBI’s now-exposed Operation Arctic Frost was personally authorized at the very top. That’s right — Attorney General Merrick Garland, Deputy AG Lisa Monaco, and FBI Director Christopher Wray each signed off on this operation that spied on GOP lawmakers and conservative organizations using tactics that, frankly, mirror the worst abuses of surveillance seen in the post-9/11 era.


Thanks to one journalist still willing to follow the facts — Catherine Herridge, who was disgracefully pushed out of CBS News — we now have a more detailed picture of what Arctic Frost really was. She dissected Grassley’s documents and found this stunning detail: the FBI used “open source media reporting” to justify surveillance efforts. Sound familiar? That’s the same playbook used to launder the Steele Dossier into the FISA system, fabricating the pretense for spying on Trump associates during the 2016 campaign.

But this isn’t ancient history. Arctic Frost wasn’t just a general surveillance net. It included the collection of phone metadata from sitting Republican lawmakers — time, location, call length. And as any intelligence professional will tell you, phone metadata can be more invasive than an actual wiretap. It paints a full behavioral map, revealing networks, relationships, patterns. It’s surveillance architecture at its most chilling — and it was used, in part, to build the basis for Special Counsel Jack Smith’s electors probe against Trump.


The implications are staggering. That charges of election interference were built, at least in part, on intelligence gathered through this extralegal dragnet should rattle anyone who still believes in civil liberties — or the Constitution.

And then there’s the matter of John Brennan. Referred for criminal prosecution, the former CIA Director is finally facing accountability, years after peddling falsehoods about the Steele Dossier and its role in the Intelligence Community Assessment. What Grassley has done here — again — is connect the dots that too many are paid not to see.


The question now isn’t whether something unlawful occurred. It’s whether the Justice Department — now possibly realigned under a Trump-led DOJ — will have the political will to prosecute its own. If Brennan is indicted, and the Arctic Frost documents are truly followed to their logical legal conclusions, we may finally be seeing the first real cracks in the weaponized shield of the intelligence bureaucracy.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top
$(".comment-click-7040").on("click", function(){ $(".com-click-id-7040").show(); $(".disqus-thread-7040").show(); $(".com-but-7040").hide(); }); // The slider being synced must be initialized first $('.post-gallery-bot').flexslider({ animation: "slide", controlNav: false, animationLoop: true, slideshow: false, itemWidth: 80, itemMargin: 10, asNavFor: '.post-gallery-top' }); $('.post-gallery-top').flexslider({ animation: "fade", controlNav: false, animationLoop: true, slideshow: false, prevText: "<", nextText: ">", sync: ".post-gallery-bot" }); });