News For You

NYT’s Issues Report On Colorado City

For nearly a year, Democratic politicians and media allies insisted that stories of gang activity in Aurora, Colorado, were nothing more than Trumpian fearmongering. But now, in a striking reversal, even The New York Times has quietly walked back its own narrative, acknowledging the violence was not only real — it was worse than many residents dared to say aloud.

The original September 2024 NYT article, titled “How the False Story of a Gang ‘Takeover’ in Colorado Reached Trump,” painted the situation in Aurora as an exaggerated or outright fabricated tale used by Donald Trump to score political points. That version of events dismissed reports of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua operating in Colorado as conspiracy-laced right-wing hysteria.


Fast forward to now — and suddenly, the Times has changed its tune. Its new headline: “Democrats Denied This City Had a Gang Problem. The Truth Is Complicated.”

But it’s not complicated. It’s clarifying.

The article details how residents like Cindy Romero — a 60-year-old woman who was once a loyal Democrat — witnessed the unfolding of organized gang activity firsthand. It began with security footage she captured in her Aurora apartment hallway: six young men armed with pistols and an assault rifle, circling a neighbor’s door. Moments later, a gunfight erupted. Bullet holes were found in her cars, neighbors’ windows were shattered, and the intended target lay dead in an alley.


Romero turned the footage over to local media and city councilwoman Danielle Jurinsky, who began sounding the alarm. At the time, local Democrats, including Rep. Jason Crow, dismissed it all as exaggeration. “There is no gang takeover in any part of Aurora,” Crow posted. That aged poorly.

Within days, Aurora PD confirmed several of the suspects in Romero’s video were likely members of Tren de Aragua — one of the most violent transnational gangs in the Western Hemisphere. But by then, the political damage was done. Democrats had already committed to the narrative that the gang story was a hoax.

And when Trump cited Aurora during a televised debate, the left doubled down, prioritizing partisan denial over public safety. They attacked the messenger — again — rather than listening to residents like Romero, who ultimately left her apartment complex after it fell under near-complete control of criminal elements.

Romero later addressed a Trump rally, calling herself a “former lifelong Democrat” and thanking the former president “for believing me.” That wasn’t an endorsement — it was an indictment of the Democratic Party’s refusal to see what was happening in front of them.


The Times piece attempts to cushion its reversal with classic hedging: “The truth lies in the middle,” it says. But the facts say otherwise. Aurora wasn’t “overrun” in the cartoonish sense — but there was, and still is, a serious gang problem fueled in part by the unchecked surge of single, young male migrants, many without proper screening or oversight.

Romero described it clearly: three waves of migrants, each less family-oriented and more dominated by young men. The third wave is when the crime, vandalism, and violence took root. Residents stopped paying rent, landlords were attacked, and tenants were held hostage and tortured for their bank account information — by suspects who were already known to police from earlier videos.

Yet, for nearly a year, Democratic officials refused to even acknowledge the trend. Instead, they called it racist fearmongering. That denial gave oxygen to the problem. Now, even liberal readers of the New York Times are recognizing the consequences.

Top-rated comments under the piece are blunt:

“Some immigrants are gang members and Democrats need to acknowledge this.”
“Denial of the problems opened the door for the harsh measures employed by the Trump administration.”

That’s the core issue. Denial. Whether it’s gangs in Colorado, violence in cities, or chaos at the border, Democratic leaders have adopted a strategy of pretending problems don’t exist until they become unmanageable — at which point, they blame the backlash on conservatives.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top
$(".comment-click-5966").on("click", function(){ $(".com-click-id-5966").show(); $(".disqus-thread-5966").show(); $(".com-but-5966").hide(); }); // The slider being synced must be initialized first $('.post-gallery-bot').flexslider({ animation: "slide", controlNav: false, animationLoop: true, slideshow: false, itemWidth: 80, itemMargin: 10, asNavFor: '.post-gallery-top' }); $('.post-gallery-top').flexslider({ animation: "fade", controlNav: false, animationLoop: true, slideshow: false, prevText: "<", nextText: ">", sync: ".post-gallery-bot" }); });