News For You

Thune Just Stabbed Trump and House Republicans In The Back

Senate Majority Leader John Thune’s latest comments have exposed a growing divide between House and Senate Republicans over how to handle government funding and several key legislative priorities before Congress leaves Washington for its August recess.

The disagreement centers on two major issues: a stopgap spending bill passed by the House to keep the federal government funded through Dec. 4 and a broader budget reconciliation package that House Republicans hope will eventually carry much of their legislative agenda, including the SAVE America Act.


The House approved the continuing resolution on Tuesday night, aiming to avoid a government shutdown ahead of the midterm elections. Supporters argued that extending current funding levels would keep the government operating while avoiding the political fallout of a shutdown during campaign season.

The measure now heads to the Senate, where its prospects are uncertain.

According to Punchbowl News, Thune indicated he has little interest in advancing the House’s version of the continuing resolution and would instead prefer negotiating a bipartisan funding package with Democrats. Reporter Jake Sherman summarized the situation by writing that Republican leaders in the House and Senate once again appear to be pursuing different strategies.

That disconnect has frustrated conservatives who expected Senate Republicans to rally behind Speaker Mike Johnson’s approach.


Fox News congressional correspondent Chad Pergram also highlighted the divide in a detailed thread explaining the House’s legislative strategy. Pergram reported that House Republicans are attempting to move several priorities simultaneously before leaving for recess, including the government funding bill, a budget framework for another reconciliation package, additional defense funding, agriculture spending, and legislation to ban House members from trading individual stocks.

The reconciliation package has become particularly important because, unlike ordinary legislation, budget reconciliation is not subject to the Senate’s 60-vote filibuster threshold. If Republicans can successfully use that process, they could potentially pass portions of their agenda with a simple majority.

Still, Thune suggested the Senate is not prepared to immediately consider the House’s reconciliation framework.


“We will hold that, subject to obviously, being able to move a continuing resolution to fund the government,” Thune said when asked about the legislation. “It’s a possibility, that if necessary, we could pull that, budget resolution passed by the House and use it to fund government.”

His remarks indicate that reconciliation could eventually become a fallback option if negotiations over a traditional spending bill fail. At the same time, Thune acknowledged concerns about using reconciliation to fund the government, saying it would represent a significant departure from longstanding congressional practice.

That strategy carries consequences beyond the funding debate.

House Republicans have proposed including tens of billions of dollars in additional defense funding, including money related to the conflict with Iran and efforts to replenish Pentagon stockpiles. If reconciliation is delayed for several months, those appropriations could also remain on hold.

Pergram noted that many Senate Republicans have been skeptical of pursuing another reconciliation package from the outset, adding another layer of uncertainty to the legislative calendar.


During this week’s Senate Republican leadership press conference, Thune outlined the chamber’s priorities before lawmakers depart for recess. Reconciliation did not feature prominently in those remarks, reinforcing the impression that the Senate is moving on a different timetable than the House.

The practical result is that several major Republican priorities remain unresolved. The House has approved a temporary funding measure and is laying the groundwork for broader legislation, while the Senate appears inclined to pursue a different path that would likely require Democratic cooperation.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top
$(".comment-click-10123").on("click", function(){ $(".com-click-id-10123").show(); $(".disqus-thread-10123").show(); $(".com-but-10123").hide(); }); // The slider being synced must be initialized first $('.post-gallery-bot').flexslider({ animation: "slide", controlNav: false, animationLoop: true, slideshow: false, itemWidth: 80, itemMargin: 10, asNavFor: '.post-gallery-top' }); $('.post-gallery-top').flexslider({ animation: "fade", controlNav: false, animationLoop: true, slideshow: false, prevText: "<", nextText: ">", sync: ".post-gallery-bot" }); });